May 08, 2008

Michigan Supreme Court disappoints

Rainbow Law Center joins the rest of the people and organizations in Michigan who have expressed their disappointment and indeed outrage at the Michigan Supreme Court's ruling Tuesday that the so-called Marriage Amendment prohibits public employers from offering health insurance benefits to same-sex partners or their dependents.

The "Marriage Amendment" (Const 1963, art1, § 25, provides: "To secure and preserve the benefits of marriage for our society and for future generations of children, the union of one man and one woman in marriage shall be the only agreement recognized as a marriage or similar union for any purpose."

You may download the entire opinion by clicking here:

Download mi_supreme_court_opinion_domestic_partner_benefits.pdf

March 01, 2008

Psychic reward

One of the unexpected perks of this new law practice (can you believe it's almost a year old now?), is that people actually appreciate what we do.  Since we began, we lost one case that we believe we should have won but, most of the time, we've been able to accomplish our clients' goals. 

We've drafted agreements (co-parenting, artificial insemination, domestic partnership, etc.), we've defended gay parents' rights to overnight visitation with their kids, we've helped them better protect their families in this hostile state (Wills, Powers of Attorney, guardianship, etc.), and we've represented clients in actions against discriminatory employers.

To our delight, we've received many thank you notes and cards.  The following is an email we recently received and is representative of what people have said.

We would like to personally thank you and Mary for doing the work that you do.  For over a year, [my partner] and I have tried to find a lawyer who understood our needs. Our search was fruitless and we were left feeling very confused and rather defeated by the legal world.  I just can't explain how great we felt leaving your office. Protecting our family [is] more important to us than anything else.  Your work is helping us find piece [sic] of mind.  Thank you for that.

We like to get paid, don't get me wrong.  But this type of payment is almost as important to me.  This is the type of psychic reward that motivates us to go the extra mile.

February 05, 2008

Creating Change and the City of Detroit

As Mary and Denise prepare to attend the 20th anniversary of Creating Change to be held in Detroit this week, it is with great excitement that we read the following announcement from Triangle (full disclosure, Denise was just named to Triangle Foundation's Board of Trustees):

Detroit City Council Welcomes Creating Change,
Supports Transgender Rights

On February 5, the Detroit City Council passed a two-part resolution opposing discrimination against transgender individuals and welcoming the National Conference on Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Equality, Creating Change. Creating Change is bringing more than 2,000 LGBT and allied activists to the Renaissance Center Feb. 6-10.

Triangle Foundation, the state's leading anti-violence and advocacy organization, and the ACLU of Michigan's LGBT Project, have worked closely with City Council to include gender identity and expression in the city's anti-discrimination ordinances.

"I can't think of a better time for City Council to pass this resolution than the eve of Creating Change," said Sean Kosofsky, director of policy for Triangle. "We will continue working with the ACLU to help Council translate this resolution into an ordinance that will protect Detroit's transgender residents, workers and visitors - like the ones coming this week for Creating Change."

“We applaud the City Council’s passage of a resolution welcoming the Creative Change Conference and its statement that it opposes gender identity or expression discrimination," said Jay Kaplan, staff attorney for the LGBT Project. "When it passed its human rights ordinance prohibiting sexual orientation discrimination in 1978, the City of Detroit demonstrated that it was a leader among major United States cities in its commitment to diversity and equal opportunity. It’s only appropriate that 30 years later, the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force has chosen the City of Detroit as its host for the Creating Change Conference,  where LGBT activists and allies from around the country will convene to work towards full equality and opportunity for LGBT people."


Please forward widely. If you have received this message from a friend, you can sign up to receive important news and Action Alerts from Triangle Foundation here.

Like what you're reading? Support Triangle Foundation's work on behalf of equality for every member of our community with a donation here.



Visit the web address below to tell your friends about this.
Tell-a-friend!

If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for Triangle Foundation.

This message was sent to umlawgirl07@comcast.net. Visit your subscription management page to modify your email communication preferences or update your personal profile. To stop ALL email from Triangle Foundation, click to remove yourself from our lists (or reply via email with "remove or unsubscribe" in the subject line).

November 21, 2007

Govenor Granholm steps up

Governor Jennifer Granholm has signed an executive directive banning discrimination in state employment based on "gender identity or expression." The directive protects nearly 50,000 state employees in Michigan's Executive branch, which encompasses 95% of all state employees. 

The Directive will protect not only transgender workers, but any state employee who faces discrimination because they do not conform to traditional gender norms in their behavior and/or appearance. This includes unfair treatment of state employees based on masculinity or femininity.

"This just shows that the State of Michigan is moving in the right direction in regards to state employees," said Michelle Fox-Phillips, executive director of Transgender Detroit. "Our sincere thanks to Triangle Foundation for their hard work [on this issue] over the years."

"We applaud Governor Granholm's executive directive prohibiting discrimination in state employment on the basis of gender identity/expression," said Kara S. Suffredini, state legislative director for the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force. "During her second inaugural address, the governor spoke about the 'Next Michigan,' one of 'transformation and opportunity.' Today's directive brings Michigan one step closer to that vision." 

"Triangle Foundation is very proud of our advocacy for this essential change in state policy, and we applaud the willingness by the Governor to make it so," said Sean Kosofsky, Director of Policy for Triangle Foundation. "We are confident that our Governor's example will help to bring about fair and inclusive employment practices in the private sector, as well as help move the state legislature to finally amend the state's civil rights law, the Elliott-Larsen Act, to fully protect against discrimination based on both gender identity and sexual orientation. The legislature has blocked fairness for far too long."

November 20, 2007

Day of Remembrance

In the three years that I blogged over at Life, Law, Gender, I never accepted an invitation to host a "review" of other blogs (or blawgs). And, so, in accepting this one I have to confess to not knowing how to do it, or what to do. Plus, I don't read blogs much anymore. And so, instead, I will simply offer this post on the day's subject.  To see what a blawg review is supposed to look like, I suggest you check out Jillian's post (or check our previous blawg reviews, all linked to here), or even better, check out Jen's Blawg Review on last year's TDOR (possibly one of the best reviews, ever).

[UPDATE] Although the following are not legal blogs, you might find them interesting.  I was particularly moved by Julie Serano's analysis of the charge of "deceit" and the role it plays in the murder of many trans-people.  I also thought Robert's post about remembering ourselves was noteworthy.  In it, he asks, are we doing enough to support and love one another so that we can turn this violence around?

Dor_head_07_2

November 20 is Transgender Day of Remembrance.  For those of you who are unfamiliar with this date and its significance, I urge you to check out the Remembering Our Dead website.

Transgender Day of Remembrance (TDOR) was first held to honor Rita Hester, who was murdered on November 28th, 1998. This marks the 9th year of international vigils and the 6th year of vigils in Ann Arbor. TDOR publicly mourns and honors the lives of those who might otherwise be forgotten. It allows us to connect again to those who are gone and raises public awareness of violence against people who transgress the normative boundaries of gender identity or expression.

This past Sunday, at the University of Michigan, I had the privilege of coordinating and hosting this year's ritual of memory.  I called it "Connections" in an attempt to remind us that we are all connected and even death does not end that.  You may download the program (in PDF form) here. Download TDOR2007Program.pdf Approximately 50 people turned out for the memorial service. It was an extremely moving evening.  Rainbow Law Center was very proud to join the Washtenaw Rainbow Action Project (WRAP) and the University's office of LGBT Affairs in co-sponsoring the evening.

During the evening, we were privileged to hear from many voices. It would do them no justice for me to here try and recreate the beauty and eloquence of their words and emotions. Instead, I offer only my own meager musings.

Nakia Ladelle Baker died in January in Tennessee as a result of blunt force trauma to the head. Keittirat Longnawa was beaten by nine youths in Thailand, who then slit her throat. In March, Moira Donaire was stabbed five times by a street vendor in Chile. The body of Michelle Carrasco was discovered in a pit in Chile, her face unrecognisable.

Ruby Rodriguez was found naked and strangled to death in the street in San Francisco. Erica Keel was repeatedly run over by a car in Pennsylvania. Bret T. Turner died from multiple stab wounds in Wisconsin. Victoria Arellano was refused HIV related medications in California. Oscar Mosqueda from Florida was shot. Maribelle Reyes from Texas was turned away from HIV treatment centres because she was transgender. In July an unidentified cross dressing male was found dead with gunshot wounds to the chest and lower back.

Once again, we gather to remember. Once again, our hearts and eyes fill as we read the names of those who didn’t survive the year. Once again it is time to mourn.

But my good friend, Andre, reminded me that it is much more than that.  It is also a time to reconnect with these souls. And, in that connection, find our own inner strength to again recommit ourselves to the end of this madness.

And, perhaps, just perhaps, it is time to reflect on how far we’ve come.

I’ve long believed that it is easier to draw strength for what lies ahead not by looking at the enormity of that task, but rather by looking at the distance one has already traveled. I have traveled this road for many years now, and I’d like to offer my perspective on that journey.

In 1995, I was among a small group of out transgender people who lobbied on Capitol Hill in Washington DC for transgender inclusion in two bills that were then under consideration in Congress: the Hate Crimes Act, and the Employment Non-Discrimination Act.  It was the first national Transgender Lobby Day and we had to educate our legislators about what the word “transgender” even meant.

Although all of us are, I’m sure, enormously disappointed with the failure of the Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) to get passed in the House with transgender inclusion, I think we should – especially on this day – not overlook the other major legislation that passed and did include gender identity.

This year, the Hate Crimes Act, renamed the Matthew Sheppard Act passed both the House of Representatives and the United States Senate. This bill included gender identity as one of the affected classes. And, I don’t know about you, but I have to tell you that I was deeply moved to hear the respectful tones by which our inclusion in these bills were debated on the floor of the House of Representatives, from people who, a dozen years ago could not even tell you the meaning of the word 'transgender'.

When I began this work, when Gwen Smith first started documenting the horror, we were losing two people a month to anti-transgender violence in this country alone. That rate continued unabated for many years. This year, we remember 11 victims of hate here in the US. That’s 11 too many. But, it’s a dramatic reduction from where we started. Perhaps our voices have help to reduce the carnage. We have come far. We still have so far to go.

I would like to end with a reminder of the work yet to do. I have to say how profoundly saddened I was to read about Ian Guarr Benson’s suicide this month. We have at least two known victims of suicide this year. Of course, we know there are many more that we never hear about. It is a rare transperson who has not considered suicide at least once in her or his life. All of us in this room understand that the suicide of a trans person arises from the same societal-based fear and hatred that led to the murders of those we remember tonight. But, there is one important distinction. The desire to live is the single strongest motivator in the human animal. To overcome that desire to take one’s own life bespeaks a pain no one should have to bear. And so, in closing, I offer a poem to this year’s victims of suicide:

Unlike some, to me death was a gift:
No longer to live pointlessly in pain.
Choosing death, I might have on my own
Let loose the darkness gathered in my heart
Except that luck has seen the matter through.

How simple, then, to let one's fortunes drift
Away from one, nor care for loss or gain
Remember me as one who, not alone
Relinquished well my moorings, to depart
Yet not without a backward glance towards you.

Continue reading "Day of Remembrance" »

November 08, 2007

RLC at the Michigan Supreme Court

Mary and Denise joined dozens of other LGBT and allied activists to pack the Michigan Supreme Court yesterday during oral arguments in the case Pride at Work v. Granholm.  The action was filed in 2005 by the ACLU of Michigan on behalf of 21 families in Ingham County Circuit Court seeking a declaratory ruling that Proposal 2, which amended the Michigan Constitution in November 2004 to prohibit gay marriage, allows public employers to offer health care insurance, otherwise called domestic partnership benefits, to lesbian and gay families.

The trial court got it right.  The Michigan Court of Appeals reversed and the Supreme Court granted leave to appeal. 

Arguing on behalf of the Plaintiff-Appellants was Deborah Labelle, ACLU of Michigan Cooperating Attorney.  She did an excellent job of both presenting the case for protecing Michigan families and responding to the questions (sometimes attacks) by the conservative majority on the bench.  Most of us think we will lose this case 4-3.  If we do, it is our sincere hope that the people of Michigan will introduce a ballot measure to reverse this awful result.  Most polls show that the people of Michigan did not intend this result when they voted to limit marriage to one man and one woman.

To read more about this important case, go to the ACLU of MI's website, here.

Mixed Emotions

The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) passed the House of Representatives yesterday, by a largely partisan vote of 235-184.  The Act, which protects workers from job discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation, passed without the transgender inclusive language which would have protected American workers on the basis of their gender identity or expression.

I have mixed emotions about this bill.  On the one hand, I am terribly proud of the US House of Representatives for finally passing this law which could protect millions of people from unwarranted discrimination in the workplace. This bill was first introduced (sans transgender protections then, as well) in the 1970s.  Passage of it has been a long time in the making.  Given the shift to the right we have witnessed in this country in the past several years (or perhaps just the shift in rhetoric), it took some courage on the part of these legislators to vote for a "Pro-gay" bill.

On the other hand, I am deeply disappointed that these same legislators decided to bring this bill to the floor at this time.  I believe them when they say they did not have the votes to pass a transgender inclusive bill.  I also believe the pundits who say that this bill, now passed in one house, will not make it into law during this session of Congress.  Either it will not get past the Senate, or the President will veto it.  So, why introduce a bill that only protects a part of the LGBT population?  Why not wait until after the elections next year when it is more likely we'll have a President who is more compassionate toward Americans?

I am very proud to have been among the very first transgender Americans to have walked the halls of Congress to help educate our Senators and Representatives about what it means to be transgender.  I attended the very first "National Lobby Day" and each of the 5 succeeding ones and have met with literally dozens of congress people and their staffs over the years.  Most of them had never heard the word "transgender" before meeting me or my fellow lobbyists.  To hear our rights debated on the floor of the House of Representatives was a stirring moment for me.  I only wish it had been a debate about including us in the family of Americans, instead of reinforcing our exclusion.

October 21, 2007

Take Action

Why 'Gender Identity’ in ENDA matters to me

   Of all the nouns that can be used to describe me – including woman, attorney, spouse, parent, homeowner, business owner – it is often the noun ‘transgender’ that sticks with people.  And, for good reason.  Despite my so-called ‘passing privilege’ I rarely let people forget that I was not always seen in my circle of family, friends, and co-workers as a woman.  And, on three separate occasions, despite exemplary professional performance in my jobs, I was terminated from senior-level executive positions because of my gender identity and expression.

  In the first such instance, I was the Vice-President of Finance for a small medical products distribution and home health care company located in Clearwater, FL.  I had been hired 4 years earlier because the company was in financial distress and needed sound management in this area.  I turned the company around and provided the owners with a liquidity they had only dreamed of.  Only months before my termination I received a letter of praise and thanks from the primary stockholder.  Then he discovered that, while away from work, I would dress as a woman.  He was so deeply offended that he called me into his office, fired me, and then had me escorted off the premises.  As a direct result of that termination my family – my children – and I lost our cars and all of our savings and were forced into bankruptcy.

   

   Later, as the Chief Financial Officer for a small publicly held computer hardware and software company located in Tampa, FL, I helped to raise the millions of dollars necessary to finance the company’s necessary research and product development.  Again, my performance reviews were full of praise and gratitude.  However, when I announced my intention to transition from living my life as a man to living it as a woman, I was asked to leave.

   However, as it turns out, I’m one of the very rare, incredibly lucky transgenders.  I met a man who did not care about my gender expression or identity.  He cared only about what I could do for his company.  Four years after hiring me (when I was hired his company was producing less than $5 million per year in sales) I orchestrated the sale of the company for him for nearly $200 million, over half of which went directly to his personal bank account. Needless to say, he is still one of my strongest advocates.

   What distinguished the third business owner from the first two was the recognition that gender plays no role in job performance.

 

   A few years later, I was privileged to attend the University of Michigan Law School.  At that time, the University prohibited discrimination against its faculty, staff, and students on several bases, including sexual orientation.  But, it did not prohibit such discrimination on the basis of gender identity or expression. A task force commissioned by the University President, Mary Sue Coleman, found that such discrimination did in fact exist on the campus. The first recommendation of that task force was amending the University’s bylaws to prohibit discrimination on the basis of gender identity or expression.  Responding to near universal support (and, indeed, some pressure) from its faculty, staff and students the University this year did amend its bylaws to provide that much needed protection for its population.  But, they were not the first and don’t merely represent the ‘liberal’ environment of higher education.  Indeed, currently 9 states and over 150 cities and municipalities – plus a large percentage of the Fortune 1000 – prohibit such discrimination.

   As I said, I’m one of the very rare, incredibly lucky ones.  Most transgender people are unemployed, or woefully underemployed.  Unemployment and underemployment of people hurts us all.

We are at an historic cross-roads. We now have an opportunity to protect American citizens from workplace discrimination that has nothing whatsoever to do with their abilities to perform their jobs.  As part of my legal education, I’ve had the opportunity to read many cases regarding discrimination in the workplace that bears striking resemblances to the discrimination which I suffered.  The jobs that were lost, represented by these cases, include airline pilots, firefighters, police officers, professors, city managers, bus drivers, and yes, business executives such as myself.  We exist in every walk of life in America. It is contrary to our country’s value system that we allow such discrimination based not on performance but on traits that are otherwise meaningless in the workforce.

   House Resolution 3685 – the Employment Non-Discrimination Act – says that it will outlaw discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.  That is a wonderful thing.  But, it falls woefully short of what it needs to do.  Over 300 local, state, and national organizations have banded together to say that this bill needs to be fixed.  Representative Tammy Baldwin has proposed an amendment to the bill that can fix it.

   PLEASE – call your representative – TODAY – and tell her/him that you strongly support the Baldwin amendment to HR 3685 and would ONLY support the bill if that amendment were a part of it.

   If you don’t know how to reach your representative, or what to say, try the following (borrowed from my friend, Phyllis):

1. Go to www.congress.org, enter your zip code and find your US Representative.

2. Call BOTH the local office and the Washington office on the phone.

 

3. Tell the person who answers that you are a constituent. You live in the district. Tell that person that you support LGBT equality at work.

4. Tell the person who answers that you want HR-3685 amended to include transgenders and straight people who may express gender a little differently than the norm (like women wearing pants or men with long hair or an earring).  Tell them that you want HR-3685 to be amended to include "gender identity or gender expression."

5. Tell the person that Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) has such an amendment and you want a YES vote on the Baldwin amendment to HR-3685.

6. Tell the person that if the Baldwin amendment fails that you want a NO vote on the non-inclusive and toothless HR-3685 that does not protect ALL of your LGBT friends, and that does not protect you because sometimes you go outside of the gender stereotype.

    The vote on the amendment is Wednesday.  Please call soon.

October 05, 2007

United ENDA

As a member of the board for the Washtenaw Rainbow Action Project (WRAP), I was proud to sign onto the following press release (I might have had a hand in writing it):

                WRAP Opposes Stripped-down Version of ENDA

The Washtenaw Rainbow Action Project (WRAP) today announced that it will support only the original Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) and will oppose any modified bill that purports to protect a part of our community at the expense of another.

As you may already know, the struggle for the passage of ENDA has been a long one. Many of us have lobbied for years, even decades, for this simple justice.  But it cannot be justice if we leave the most vulnerable of our constituency behind.  The incremental approach to rights sounds plausible, but it rarely works.  In 1990, with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) assured passage, an amendment to exclude HIV+ food workers was added at the last minute.  The leaders of the disability rights movement would have none of it.  At the risk of losing the protections they had worked lifelong to achieve, they stood firm. All of us, or none of us. As a result, HIV-positive workers who handle food are covered by the ADA to this day.

WRAP is proud to join the growing list of organizations that oppose this politically-motivated, misguided effort by the House leadership to weaken our community through divisive means. Doing so sends the wrong message – to our own community, to the power brokers in Congress, and to society-at-large. Among the list of organizations that oppose the stripped-down version of ENDA are the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force, hosts of Creating Change, Lambda Legal, and Michigan’s own Triangle Foundation and Michigan Equality. For a complete and up-to-date list of the over 150 organizations please visit www.UnitedENDA.org.

WRAP urges you to contact your United States Representative today – right now – and tell them you support only the original, inclusive version of H.R. 2015. The Representative for Ann Arbor, Ypsilanti and eastern Washtenaw County is Congressman John Dingell and you can contact him at (734) 481-1100, or email him at public.dingell@mail.house.gov. For western Washtenaw County, your representative is Congressman Tim Walberg and he can be contacted at (517) 780-9075.

The WRAP Board of Directors
Michael G. McGuire, President
Jeremy Merklinger, Vice-President
Jim Toy, Secretary
Barry MacDougal, Treasurer
Denise Brogan-Kator
Jim Fuester

September 25, 2007

Rainbow Law Center accepts UofM legal insurance

The Rainbow Law Center is happy to announce that it has been added to the University of Michigan's preferred provider network and now accepts the Univesity's Legal Plan insurance, underwritten by Hyatt Legal Plans.